Skip to main content
Back to blog
Engineering2026-04-3011 min read

Voice latency benchmarks: Cartesia, ElevenLabs, OpenAI side by side

Real-world TTFT measurements across 12 STT/LLM/TTS combos. Charts, methodology, and the combos we recommend per use case.

EM

Elina Müller

Engineering

Voice latency benchmarks: Cartesia, ElevenLabs, OpenAI side by side

We ran the same 1,000 utterances through 12 different STT/LLM/TTS stacks. Every combo got the same audio, the same prompt, the same hardware. Here's what we found.

TTFT, the only number that matters

Time-to-first-token is the gap between the user finishing speech and the agent starting to speak back. Under 800ms feels conversational. Over 1.2s feels robotic. Over 2s and customers hang up.

The winners

  • Fastest: Deepgram Nova-3 + GPT-4o mini + Cartesia Sonic-3, 480ms median TTFT
  • Best quality: Deepgram Nova-3 + Claude Sonnet 4.5 + ElevenLabs Multilingual v2, 1.1s TTFT, premium voice
  • Cheapest viable: Deepgram Nova-3 + GPT-4o mini + Deepgram Aura, 420ms, $0.05/min COGS

If you're optimising for cost AND quality, GPT-4o mini is the sweet spot. Claude Haiku is 2x the price for marginal quality lift in most use cases.

What hurts latency

  • Long system prompts (>2k tokens): +200-400ms
  • Tool use that reaches an external API: +500ms to +3s
  • Multilingual TTS with code-switching: +250ms
  • Cold provider connections: +600ms first request
EM

Written by

Elina Müller

Engineering

Elina builds the voice runtime at Floo. Loves low-latency systems.

Share this post

Want to hear Floo in action?

60-second demo, no card required.

Build Your First AI Voice Agent

Create an AI voice agent for inbound calls, outbound campaigns, customer support, lead qualification or appointment booking and test your first conversation before going live.

Start building your first agent